|
Mortgage Risk Management
When most mortgage producers and
lenders think of
mortgage compliance and
mortgage quality control, they think of the things that keep the state and
mortgage agencies auditors off their backs. The difference between mortgage
compliance/quality control and mortgage risk management are the odds of having a
repurchase or indemnification from FHA, FMAE, FMAC, or an investor.
The risk is in the financial burden having to take ownership in the loan
whether it was fraudulent or just poor risk assessment prior to closing.
The lack of a risk management
plan could result in a financial set back in lending and mortgage operations. Also, one should consider the adverse
effects it may have on any agency or investor relationships. The compliance and quality control mostly
focuses on having the correct information in the loan i.e., disclosures, signed
and dated documentation, and correct charges which have little or no effect on
whether the loan is fraudulent or will remain in good standing.
The majority of fraudulent loans
are an inside job. Borrowers are not sophisticated enough to know the inner
workings of a mortgage loan to get it through the difference stages of loan
processing, underwriting, and closing.
This is true even when a robust
compliance program is active.
The reason fraudulent loans get through underwriting is the underwriter is
focused on ratios and check lists to get the loan through while compliance is
looking for the appropriate disclosures, signatures, dates, and appropriate
charges with very little effort placed on the depth of the loan or the risk
assessment.
Many of the mortgage fraud
investigations
Quality Mortgage Services has participated in resulted in recognizing that
preventive risk management procedures may have raised a flag prior to closing. Most management officials and compliance
managers want better tools of risk management capabilities built into their
existing business workflows to mitigate risks against fraud, so adverse risks
can be detected prior to closing.
Fannie Mae has found that:
-
Income/Employment information was inflated or
fabricated (25%)
-
Credit history, liabilities and/or identity were
misrepresented (21%)
-
Property value was inflated and there was
misrepresentation in other areas of the loan transaction (15%)
-
Intent to occupy the subject property was
materially misrepresented (15%)
-
Assets (5%) 1
“An Occasional Newsletter from Fannie Mae’s Customer Education Group”,
Focus on…Preventing, Detecting & Reporting Mortgage Fraud, December 2005
|
Lenders predict an increase in
fraud cases in:
-
Identity theft
-
Falsified or Misrepresented loan application
-
Falsified or altered support documentation
-
Inflated home appreciation
-
Inappropriate house flipping
In most cases, underwriters are
over worked and under pressure to get loans to closing.
Post closing quality assurance validates the compliance and credit worthiness of
loans with little or no risk assessment.
REMEMBER…. Mortgage fraud is usually an inside job and the individuals
involved know the weaknesses of the system and know what it takes to get loans
through. In most cases when fraud is
an inside job, several properties are involved resulting in large liability
costs back to the originating source.
Does every lender/mortgage banker
need to perform risk management?
Yes, however, the majority of the loans closed and sold are solid.
Management must determine what degree or level of risk management needs
to be performed by analyzing the following:
What the acceptable financial burden is from
repurchases or indemnifications and all associated costs involved in the
repurchase?
What level of tolerance will an agency or investor
accept in defaulted loans before severing their relationship?
What will adverse relationships and reputation cost?
What is the Return on Investment in performing risk
management verses accepting a percentage of repurchase or indemnification?
What level of confidence and creditability is
perceived by the agency or investor by having a risk management program?
|